davidkm: (Default)
Matt Bialer, 2014, TELL THEM WHAT I SAW, A POETRY COLLECTION COLLECTION, STANZA POETRY #10, 169 pages, ISBN  978-1-848636-98-9, Jacketed Hardcover, COVER BY Matthew Revert, Stanza Press, a division of PS publishing, Grosvenor House, 1 New Road, Hornsea, HU18 1PG, England, PS Publishing, www.pspublishing.co.uk, £15.00.

Most of the poems in this book use a common format, making liberal use of extra spaces among groups of words as a substitute for line breaks. This makes them look like prose, but they don't read like it. Instead, the result is a stream of consciousness feel, which goes very well with the subject matter covered. This, broadly stated, is poetry about how science, technology, and the supernatural affect the lives of ordinary people. Some of these poems are narratives about the history of science; the speculative element in these is minor. Other poems in Tell Them What I Saw are purely SF or fantasy. For instance, the one for which the book is named.

The book title comes from a short fantasy poem. It recounts a deathbed scene from the point of view of the person dying, but it ends before either death or revival, leaving the outcome unknown. The view of the near-death experience presented by this poem is nearly as mundane as they get (floating above the bed, seeing a bright light, etc.); it really isn't very interesting or satisfying. It does have a great title; and, despite the banal subject, is written well. It's easy to believe you are that dying man. Maybe that's why it was chosen to provide the title for the book.

I’m above the nurses station Laughter, tonight’s double date
At the Well My mind more clear Bright light everywhere
The doctor motions for the defibrillator paddles to shock me back

Tell Them What I Saw opens with a long science/history poem entitled "many worlds." This is a biography, in verse, of the physicist Hugh Everett III, author of the many-worlds hypothesis so important to SF. Not an SF poem at all, but a fascinating look at the father of parallel worlds. Typical of this volume, the poem is filled with the person of its subject and his family; it is an engaging biography, and very immediate. Other physicists had problems with the theoretical underpinnings of Everett's idea back in the day, and it's not generally accepted now. But oh, the possibilities!

for Hugh
The cat has split
Both alive and dead
Different universes
As the wave function evolves
Through time
It constantly splits off
New universe for each coordinate point

Some of the SF poems are straightforward extrapolations from the science we know. Here is a bit of “Dark Mission,” Bialer's take on the military-hiding-aliens trope. This time, structures on the moon:

My older son: Are there aliens on the Moon?
Rises behind fog, mist like a rubbing No, of course not
Can’t tell him I’ve seen the images—, Apollo, Lunar Orbiters,
Clementine Satellite Not the blur/smudge tampering for the public
Tiered, rectilinear structures Western edge, Sea of Tranquility—

The poem reminds me of a novel by Jack McDevitt that hangs on the same premise. It's a difficult thing to cover such a familiar topic well, and such a broad topic well, in a poem, but Bialer carries it off. Other poems cover “Crop circles” (aliens did it), memories from past lives (“Past Life;” it happens), Houdini, lost twins, aliens, demons, psychics, everything told in a matter-of-fact way, eerily enhancing the realism by bringing the wildest ideas down to earth.

These 47 poems are beautifully concise and emotionally powerful. I wish I'd written them. Funny thing. If you read the lit-crit reviews that came attached to the review copy of this book that I saw, you might have been completely turned off. The first review is by someone who might never have read another spec poem. I think everything the second reviewer said about Bialer's poetry is true, but the way he said it made me feel that I needed a degree just to proceed. Clearly, I'm not part of the publisher's target demographic. Fortunately, I needn't have worried. Tell Them What I Saw is a book every fan of spec poetry really should read, and will enjoy. This will be nominated for the Elgin.
davidkm: (Default)
Note: This review was written (and published elsewhere) a long time ago, and I don't know if the chapbook is still available. But it might be.

REVIEW

Alec Kowalczyk, 2004, Shadow and Substance, Snark publishing, 637 West Hwy. 50 # 119, O’Fallon IL 62269, ISBN 0-9728948-8-8, $5, 32 pages, saddle-stitched.


When I first picked up this chapbook by Alec Kowalczyk I was struck by the unusual cover. Genre poetry collections usually have no cover art or drawings on the cover, but this one has a photograph. A very nice photograph, but one that looks like it belongs on the cover of a mainstream poetry collection. I had published a couple of Alec's poems and assumed this was a genre collection, but it really isn't. This is a mainstream collection. The book includes mostly very short poems: some are haiku and some belong to other forms. It doesn't take long to read one of these poems and you are on to the next one, unless you stop to think about it. This might be a good idea, because these poems have layers. And that is another advantage of a collection of very short poems. If each poem is good enough to make you ponder, then with more poems you get more bang for your buck.

I said this wasn't a genre chapbook. However, it does contain science-fiction poems, science poems, and fantasy poems, at least if you want to be a bit generous with your definitions, and that is always a good idea.

If I was a real reviewer I would now make some cute tie-in between the title, the title poem, and life, the universe, and everything. You're probably hoping for this, but it's not my thing. I would like to give you a taste of what this book contains. Here is one of the worlds from a poem called "three worlds":

while immediately below
the sun sparkles off a circling carp

And here is one that I think could be considered a genre poem:

"Roadside Gothic"

abandoned diner
rooted and overgrown
-- the click of a cup?


Whatever. Even if you don't agree with me about classification, which is admittedly subjective, I still think you should get this book, and read it, more than once. And, oh yes, I did recognize a couple of these poems. I was happy to see them again.


End

Profile

davidkm: (Default)
davidkm

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
91011 1213 1415
161718192021 22
232425262728 29
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 23rd, 2026 03:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios